Articles

Updates, information and articles from Hampton & South Medical Centre.

Shocking final heights released for Hampton

April 6, 2026

The State Government has released its final building heights for Hampton and has now gazetted the new plans, meaning they are now part of the planning scheme.

The government factsheet for the North Brighton to Sandringham Activity Centres can be viewed here:

Brighton Activity Centres Fact Sheet 2025.

These final heights have ignored the strong feedback provided to the State Government by Hampton residents, the membership of the HNA, and Bayside City Councillors. The Council sent the State Government much more reasonable proposed height limits which still achieved increased population targets.

Why has this proposal been ignored?

The final plans have increased heights in core Hampton areas

  • Woolworths / Cabin Carpark / adjacent shops - increased from 8 storeys to 12 storeys
  • Hampton Community Centre and area on Hampton Street side - now up to 16 storeys. Hampton is the only Bayside centre with 16 storey heights.
  • Continuous 8 and 12 storey strip along Hampton Street from Small Street to South Road

This will create serious overshadowing and a wind tunnel effect.

Height limits for the inner and outer catchment areas remain unacceptable

  • Inner catchment: 4 storeys and up to 6 storeys on larger sites
  • Outer catchment: 3 storeys and up to 4 storeys on larger sites

Other major concerns

  • No provision for additional green space and infrastructure
  • The Department of Transport and Planning has now gazetted these new plans, so they are now part of the planning scheme
  • Builders and developers will be able to get rapid approval for very large developments in Hampton, without any input from residents or the Bayside City Council

Here are the new height maps for Hampton:

Overview map of North Brighton, Middle Brighton, Hampton and Sandringham activity centre areasOverview map of the Bayside activity centre areas.

Inner Catchment height limits: up to 4 storeys, and up to 6 storeys on larger lots

Outer Catchment height limits: up to 3 storeys, and up to 4 storeys on larger lots

Hampton height mapHeight map for Hampton showing the most intense change around the activity centre core.

Legend for the Hampton height mapLegend from the government map.

What you can do

Sign the HNA petition The new plans have already been gazetted, meaning they are now part of the Planning Scheme.

We thank you for your ongoing support.

Warm regards,

Hamish Hughes

President, HNA

Better Decisions Bill – outcome

December 10, 2025

How Your Southern Metropolitan Upper House MPs Voted on the Better Decisions Bill

Late on Tuesday 9 December 2025, the Victorian Parliament passed the Planning and Environment (Better Decisions Made Faster) Bill. This occurred during extended sitting days, which many observers noted were used to rush multiple bills through before the Christmas recess.

For Hampton and the wider Bayside local area — which sits at the very heart of the State Government’s proposed high-density Activity Centre rezonings — the actions of our Southern Metropolitan Members of the Legislative Council are especially important to understand and remember.

Your Southern Metro representatives and their positions

Supported the Bill

  • Katherine Copsey — Greens
  • Supported the Government in passing the Bill.

Opposed the Bill

  • Georgie Crozier — Liberal Party
  • David Davis — Liberal Party
  • Richard Welch — Liberal Party

These members voted against the Bill and supported stronger Parliamentary scrutiny of the State’s planning reform measures.

Why this matters for Hampton

Hampton’s Activity Centre precinct — including key business, medical and residential areas — is directly affected by the State’s proposed changes. The Better Decisions Bill gives the Planning Minister broad, unilateral powers to:

  • reduce or remove community rights to be notified or heard
  • override councils on planning rule changes
  • fast-track approvals, including for multi-storey development

The potential impacts are local and real: overshadowing, loss of village character, and reduced transparency in planning outcomes.

HNA’s message going forward

Hampton residents have shown they are not “blockers” or “NIMBYs” — they accept that population growth requires new housing. But this must be good growth, properly consultative, and respectful of local communities.

We will continue working constructively with all our representatives — at all levels of Government and regardless of their political affiliations — to ensure:

  • proper limits on Ministerial discretion
  • community participation is retained, not further reduced
  • local planning knowledge is valued as essential input
  • Hampton’s village amenity is protected as we deliver housing

We thank every local resident who took action during this campaign — and we will keep you informed about the next steps.

Elected Committee

November 26, 2025

Hampton Neighbourhood Association is an incorporated association established September 2014.

We represent the community in discussions with federal, state and municipal government on issues that affect residents and businesses, such as transport, traffic and urban development.

If you have a query or something you’d like to share, please email us at community@hna.org.au.

President – Hamish Hughes

Hamish is a long-time Bayside resident and property owner with a strong commitment to balanced and sustainable local development. With expertise in finance and management, he brings strategic insight and leadership to the Hampton Neighbourhood Association, ensuring a thoughtful approach to community growth and engagement.

Vice-President – Dr Michael Daly

Dr Michael Daly brings a unique blend of professional insight and lived experience to his role as Vice President of the Hampton Neighbourhood Association. He practises from small premises in the very epicentre of Hampton’s planning change zone, where proposed 2025 planning changes may enable buildings of up to 16 storeys in the immediate surrounding area. This proximity gives him a direct and practical understanding of the impacts such developments can have on local amenity, character, traffic, and community wellbeing.

With a Masters in Business and a long career in healthcare, Dr Daly contributes strong problem-solving skills, strategic thinking and practical governance experience to the Association.

Treasurer – Gino De Biase

As Treasurer of the Hampton Neighbourhood Association, Gino brings decades of experience in financial management and governance. With a keen eye for detail and a strong background in oversight and accountability, he ensures the Association’s resources are managed responsibly. His extensive experience in complex matters and strategic decision-making helps support the Association’s work in strengthening the local community.

Secretary – Judy Bissland OAM

Judy and her husband Ian have lived in Hampton since 1998. She believes in the importance of having connected communities, is involved in a number of local community organisations and loves the friendly village-like atmosphere of Hampton.

She has been involved in opposing inappropriate development in Hampton since 2016 and has been actively involved on the HNA Committee since 2019. Along with the other members of HNA Committee, Judy has been strongly advocating for Council to proceed with the multi-service Hampton Hub which has been on the drawing board since 2013.

Judy’s professional background is in education. She spent 30 years in Swinburne’s TAFE Division as a teacher, department manager and ultimately Executive Director. She subsequently worked at Sandy Beach Centre in Sandringham, managing educational and community engagement projects.

Committee Members

  • John Dulfer
  • John Turner
  • Simon Gipson OAM
  • Di Ohlrich


HNA’s Response to Draft Activity Centre Plan

October 19, 2025

From: Hampton Neighbourhood Association Inc.

Date: October 19, 2025

Submission to the Activity Centres Team – Hampton Activity Centre

Objection to Proposed Planning Changes

The Hampton Neighbourhood Association (HNA) appreciates the opportunity to provide this submission in response to the State Government’s proposed planning changes for the Hampton Activity Centre.

HNA represents a large and active local membership of residents committed to ensuring that housing growth is managed in a way that respects neighbourhood character, local heritage, environmental considerations and community amenity.

1. Excessive Heights and Scale of Development

The proposed rezoning along Hampton Street allowing buildings between 8 and 16 storeys represents a profound departure from the existing Bayside Planning Scheme. Such a scale of development would:

·         Destroy the established village character that defines Hampton;

·         Overwhelm shopper parking and local traffic networks;

·         Create wind tunnel effects and major overshadowing of public areas;

·         Diminish the visual and social cohesion of Hampton Street

We therefore call for a significant reduction in the proposed height limits. It should also be noted that a great many apartments added to Hampton in the last two years are empty. There are estimates of over 100 vacant apartments.

2. Inner Catchment Impacts

The proposed 6-storey height limits for larger sites in the inner catchment are entirely inconsistent with the surrounding built form of 1- and 2-storey dwellings. Such structures would result in extensive overshadowing and overlooking.

HNA supports limiting the inner-catchment height to 3 storeys, except for:

  • dwellings in the coastal zone, where the existing maximum height of two storeys plus an attic should be retained
  • blocks exceeding 1,000 m² where 4 storeys may be acceptable.  

3. Outer Catchment Impacts

In the outer catchment, the proposal to allow 4-storey apartment blocks would lead to unacceptable overshadowing and overlooking of nearby single-storey homes.


HNA recommends restricting heights in the outer catchment to 3 storeys, combined with a reduction in the total area designated as the outer catchment.

4. Inadequate Heritage Mapping and Protection

While the State Government has now provided maps showing heritage zones, these were released far too late in the consultation process, undermining residents’ ability to provide informed feedback.


Moreover, while heritage overlays prevent demolition of listed structures or features, they do not prevent vertical additions or clarify how multiple overlays will interact.


HNA formally seeks assurances that existing heritage overlays will be maintained and that any new planning controls will explicitly protect the scale, sightlines, and settings of heritage precincts.

5. Consultation and Process Deficiencies

The consultation process has been inadequate and rushed, with unrealistic timelines that precluded meaningful community engagement. Community groups and councils alike have been denied the opportunity to develop coordinated, evidence-based responses.  

In addition, the input provided by Bayside Council and the Community Reference Groups in the first round of consultation was completely ignored.

6. Absence of Infrastructure Planning 

There has been no accompanying plan for the infrastructure required to support the population growth implied by the proposed up-zoning — including transport, drainage, public open space, schools, and community facilities. 

These vital infrastructure elements are already under stress as a result of the significant development undertaken in Hampton to date. Further development on the scale contemplated by the proposed planning changes without delivery of additional infrastructure capacity will result in:

  • materially increased traffic congestion (with concomitant costs for business),
  • local flooding during storms as the effects of climate change are increasingly felt; and,
  • poorer outcomes with respect to health, education and community cohesion.

7. Undermining of Local Planning Integrity

Hampton (and more broadly Bayside) has already successfully accommodated significant housing growth under Council’s DDO12 Structure Plan. DDO12 still provides significant additional housing capacity while using appropriate height and design limits for the liveability of Hampton.

This has been completely ignored by the Activity Centre proposals for Bayside. Bayside City Council has repeatedly confirmed it is on track to meet its 2051 housing target under existing planning controls. As recently reported in THE AGE, it is one of only seven Councils on track to meet its 2051 goal. 

The Activity Centre proposal for Bayside and Hampton therefore lacks justification and should be withdrawn and replaced with a proposal which takes on board input from Bayside Council and the community.


The proposed State-driven rezoning seeks to replace Council’s balanced and successful approach with a top-down, centrally controlled model that removes local discretion and community input, including the loss of third-party rights of appeal at VCAT. The result will undermine the integrity of local planning and lead to poor planning outcomes and unacceptable community impacts.

Conclusion

HNA supports an increase in thoughtful, well-located housing that complements Hampton’s character and meets community needs. However, the proposed amendments are destructive and would permanently damage the environment and livability of our suburb.

We therefore urge the State Government Planning team to:

  1. Substantially reduce the proposed building heights for Hampton Street and its inner and outer catchments;
  2. Retain and respect the existing DDO12 framework as the basis for future development.
  3. Ensure full heritage protections and release comprehensive mapping before further consultation;
  4.  Provide clear evidence of infrastructure capacity to support any increased densities; and
  5.  Re-establish a genuine collaborative process with Council and the community.

We would greatly appreciate a response to our input.

Regards,

Hamish Hughes

President HNA

```